[OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

[Christoph Hormann]

On Thursday 30 April 2020, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> The most recent version of 
> the guidelines drafted by the LWG is almost there, but has drawn
> community criticism about being too generous especially w.r.t.
> initially hidden attribution.

Wow, that is quite a weird statement considering how broad, deep and 
sustained much of the criticizm from the community has been on the 
direction of the LWG proposal for many months.  If the board 
collectively has the impression they are 'almost there' you might need 
to prepare for the collision of that perception with reality.

Unless of course you have worked on a fundamental redesign of the 
guideline we are not yet aware of...

If you have the impression that the LWG has taken into account or has 
engaged in a constructive argument with the community regarding the 
criticizm of their draft re-reading the many discussions of the past 
months on that subject - and possible engaging in a discussion of the 
criticizm if there is need for clarification or explanation - would be 
highly advisable.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/