[OSM-talk] Proper use of route relations?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Aug 2 06:57:19 UTC 2020




2 Aug 2020, 07:14 by talk at openstreetmap.org:

>
>
> Le 1 août 2020 22:08:17 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>
>>
> >sent from a phone
>
>>> On 1. Aug 2020, at 20:48, Yves via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This would be better joined in a site relation.
>>>
>>
>>
> >why should it? What’s the benefit? How is this different to adding all roads of a village into a site relation?
>
>>
>>
>
> If the set of trail is at least well known under a name, why not?
>
If such name is applied to set of ways 
then it makes sense but AFAIK
it is not typical and was not mentioned
so far as appearing in this case.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200802/1b7b1a9a/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list