[OSM-talk] Roadmap for deprecation of name tags in OSM

[pangoSE]

Thanks 😀
I actually tried searching for it before posting but did not find it. 
I accept the statement from Lydia closing it:
"I've been thinking a lot about this. The prefixes Q, P, L, F, S, E and M are there to represent the concepts of Items, Properties, Lexemes, Forms, Senses, Entity Schemas and MediaInfo respectively. They are not intended as an indication of a specific Wikibase instance. Each entity type should be addressed with the same letter on every Wikibase instance. Distinction between individual Wikibase instances needs to happen with prefixes for example."

Our prefix could be "od:" for OSMData.

mmd <mmd.osm at gmail.com> skrev: (9 augusti 2020 14:42:42 CEST)
>On 2020-08-09 14:33, pangoSE wrote:
>
>
>>> IIRC, Yuri already tried that when implementing Wikibase on our own
>>> wiki, and it turned out to be massively complicated, not to say not
>>> feasible at all. Didn't you follow that discussion back then?
>> 
>> I was not aware. Link? 
>> Its not a dealbreaker for me but it would be nice to avoid confusion
>for non SPARQL aware users.
>> 
>
>Here we go: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T202676
>
>
>-- 
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200809/ce2a98bc/attachment.htm>