[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

[80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru]

FYI;
 
for all of you who are not in country and do not understand about usa city bounders.
 
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html
 
and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data not true map data.
 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89598349 .
 
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:52 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar < jumbanho at gmail.com >:
> 
>What link are you using for this? I downloaded the places boundary
>information from here:
>https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php
>
>As I said, I'm happy to change, but I can't change without actual
>information.
>
>On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:43 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
>> i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and
>> nothing you did matches.
>>
>> i live here and a block away from the edens spur just saying.
>>
>> > Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:38 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar <
>> >  jumbanho at gmail.com >:
>> >
>> > It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the
>> > changeset comments, as they don't need to be discussed on the
>> > mailing
>> > list.
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:36 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote:
>> > > I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the
>> > map to
>> > > better authoritative data or information. My motivation for this
>> > was
>> > > to fix a mangled boundary relation that didn't have consistent
>> > outer
>> > > and inner members. The changes came in two changesets,
>> > >  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89220282 and
>> > >  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89516909
>> > >
>> > > The first changeset just made the relation consistent with outer
>> > ways
>> > > and inner ways. I preserved all the ways that were in the
>> > relation
>> > > that
>> > > lead to the inconsistency and they are still in the database with
>> > a
>> > > note attached to them. The second came after a changeset comment
>> > that
>> > > noted that the fixed relation didn't match and earlier unbroken
>> > > relation, in particular around the Edens Spur. I then changed the
>> > > border in this area to match the 2019 Tiger data in that area
>> > only.
>> > >
>> > > James
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 02:37 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us
>> > wrote:
>> > > > Changeset #89220282
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Monday, August 17, 2020 6:34 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson <
>> > > > >  miketho16 at gmail.com >:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:24 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>> > > > >  talk-us at openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>> > > > > > tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i
>> > > > > > just
>> > > > > > think he picked the wrong year,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That relation was first created in 2009. According to the
>> > source
>> > > > > tag, it used 2008 Tiger data, so the original mapper probably
>> > > > > used
>> > > > > the best available TIGER data at the time.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > also all he got was a white line in his first try.
>> > > > > > Way:  813726663
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That way needs to be added to the relation, and the relation
>> > must
>> > > > > close.
>> >
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200819/56429201/attachment.htm>