[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

[Wayne Emerson, Jr.]

I wasn't saying you should import it. You were disputing about which 
dataset was more accurate. The County GIS is usually the best. You could 
compare the 2 in dispute, and use the county data to settle the argument.

Many TIGER Lines are better now but in the past have been greatly 
scorned for how inaccurate they were.

On 8/18/2020 9:39 PM, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
> i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.
>
>     Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sperlongano
>     <zelonewolf at gmail.com>:
>     All,
>     I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town
>     (Wheeling, IL) using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data
>     source, and re-used all of the original boundary relations.
>     Unfortunately it appears that all of Cook County needs to be
>     updated to reflect the county GIS data (found here:
>     https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/boundary-open-data).
>     Those census polygons are fairly close, but different.  The two
>     border towns I checked just north in Lake County appear to line up
>     perfectly with the Cook County data so this might just be a Cook
>     County issue.  This is a start but there's lots of work to do there.
>     On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:10 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us
>     <talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>     <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2dus at openstreetmap.org>>
>     wrote:
>
>         lines no relations yes
>
>             Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>             <miketho16 at gmail.com
>             <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amiketho16 at gmail.com>>:
>             On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via
>             Talk-us <talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>             <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org>>
>             wrote:
>
>                 i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
>                 and it is not a polygon,
>
>             As far as I know, boundary relations have to, in effect,
>             be polygons, in other words, they have to close.
>
>                 and i broke nothing i fixed what the other guy broke
>                 and did it all by hand.
>
>             The boundary relation (126598) is currently broken. for
>             one thing, it doesn't close at the location of
>             Williamsberg Square residential area.
>             _______________________________________________
>             talk mailing list
>             talk at openstreetmap.org
>             <http:///compose?To=talk@openstreetmap.org>
>             https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Talk-us mailing list
>         Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>         <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-us mailing list
>     Talk-us at openstreetmap.org </compose?To=Talk%2dus at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk




-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200818/cd39907b/attachment-0001.htm>