[OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Dec 8 08:43:13 UTC 2020


Can you give an example of something that would follow
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice
and still would not fulfill ODBL?

I see no obvious loopholes there.

Dec 7, 2020, 22:57 by rory at technomancy.org:

> It's good to see more discussion on this. I like that this document lays out the moral requirment to attribute. We don't ask for any money, but we do ask you to attribute us. It's a very good bargain.
>
> But I think this attribution is too vague. It's advice seems to restate the relevant section from the ODbL. There are many examples of poor attribution where someone could argue that they meet this standard.
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, at 21:41, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
>> I appreciate the wik page "Community attribution advice" which was made 
>> by another community member. It seems to give good advice about how 
>> database users can comply with the attribution guidelines in a way that 
>> everybody* in this community can support.
>>
>> Please review the page and make any comments for improvement if needed: 
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_attribution_advice
>>
>> -- Joseph Eisenberg
>>
>> (*Note that "everybody" does not include the interests of corporations, 
>> which are not persons, but rather the interests of individual mappers 
>> and database users)
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20201208/87c23a7e/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list