[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

[Paul Johnson]

I feel like the whole thing is a super moot point anyway.  AT&T (as does
every other carrier) has a vested self-interest to sign their properties.
It's publicly observable, therefore it's mappable.

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 1:54 PM Steve Friedl <steve at unixwiz.net> wrote:

> There is no question that the building was **damaged**.
>
>
>
> There is only a question whether that was the **target** or if the driver
> of the RV just happened to stop there.
>
>
>
> The only actual evidence we have is wild speculation.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2020 11:47 AM
> *To:* OpenStreetMap talk mailing list <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville,
> Tennessee, USA.
>
>
>
> https://about.att.com/pages/disaster_relief/nashville.html​​​​​​​
>
>
> Sunday, December 27, 2020 1:41 PM -06:00 from Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:
>
>
> I'm confused. Was the AT&T building somehow the target of this bombing? I
> can't find any reports that say it would be. Obviously there is a lot of
> damage and because of that mobile phone service is disrupted across the
> city. But that's the extent of the aftermath I could dig up.
>
>
>
> Jo
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:26 PM Chuck Sanders <nathhad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree, that link does appear to clearly prove Steve's point, and answer
> the question as well.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020, 12:17 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <
> talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> https://goo.gl/maps/JDYpWMi1Uw6h2wpu9
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020, 10:39 AM Steve Friedl <steve at unixwiz.net
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3asteve@unixwiz.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> This is nonsense; the building in Nashville has a* HUGE AT&T logo on it*,
> so this is no kind of secret.
>
>
>
> If somebody on the ground  can tell it’s an AT&T building, it should be
> tagged as an AT&T building.
>
>
>
> *From:* 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk@openstreetmap.org>>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2020 7:33 AM
> *To:* Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org>;
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTagging@openstreetmap.org>;
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3alegal%2dtalk@openstreetmap.org>;
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk@openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee,
> USA.
>
>
>
> because nobody knows where there at, like a military base, unless you live
> in the area.
> and now there under guard.
>
>
> Sunday, December 27, 2020 9:01 AM -06:00 from Steve Friedl <
> steve at unixwiz.net
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3asteve@unixwiz.net>>:
>
>
> The building is still there, and why would we untag ALL AT&T buldings?
>
>
>
> Do we have the responsibility to un-tag, delete all AT&T building.
>
>
>
> *From:* 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org
> <http://compose?To=talk@openstreetmap.org>>
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:23 AM
> *To:* talk at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk@openstreetmap.org>;
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org>;
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <http://compose?To=Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* [OSM-talk] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Do we have the responsibility to un-tag, delete all AT&T building.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
> ry mapping service, not just OSM. Hence, definitely not an example of why
> a corporation's buildings covered in logos would be something to remove.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20201227/2c84dc8d/attachment-0001.htm>