[OSM-talk] "helpful" remote correctional edits (or "please don't correct bank ATMs in the Sahara desert" - was: Re: Planned revert of added surface and tracktype tags without local knowledge in various countries)
Jóhannes Birgir Jensson
joi at betra.is
Sun Jul 19 21:26:47 UTC 2020
Incredibly enough surfaces also change, no doubt many of our gravel tracks were correct at the time and have now been paved or bound.
19. júlí 2020 kl. 20:33, skrifaði "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 19. Jul 2020, at 14:48, Hauke Stieler <mail at hauke-stieler.de> wrote:
>>
>> Blind reverts are also pretty bad. In my case, I talked to other people
>> in our community and only reverted some of the edits, which are very
>> unplausible (like "grade4" with "surface=paved" and imagery showing a
>> paved way).
>
> I also just today corrected some roads which all had the highway=track tag with surface=gravel and
> track type grade2 or 1, but actually some were paved narrow residential/unclassified roads in the
> country side, with speed limits (30), reflectors and guard rails in parts, some were signposted
> private driveways, and some houses, farmyards and b&bs, some were actually tracks. It’s hard to
> tell from the imagery (that there are houses is obviously visible, but the difference between
> gravel and asphalt may be hard to tell), and it was misleading for me, until I came there and
> understood that the information in the area in OpenStreetMap was unreliable (looked like detailed
> tagging but then half of these details were fictional).
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
More information about the talk
mailing list