[OSM-talk] fake mapping

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 11:22:43 UTC 2020


And there is no need to be comprehensive. Map it as you you, little
by little.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 12:15 Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk at openstreetmap.org:
>
> just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours
> by public transportation.
>
> the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the
> dam, which was not there in 1969
>
> when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were
> all marked unmaintained track road.
>
> there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole
> property, where natural woods
>
> that have separate pologons.
>
> the point is there is to much there to fix.
>
> Yes, in many cases map should be updated. If aerial images are wrong it is
> useful to add
> something like
> note=edited based on survey, as of 2020 Bing aerial imagery is outdated
> and wrong
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200609/56b6d158/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list