[OSM-talk] Could/should editors detect/disallow huge changeset bboxes?

80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru 80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru
Sat Jun 13 16:49:57 UTC 2020

>i did that it was 10 feet than someone says it can not be 10 feet a mile or so down the road and he is right 
>so i changed it but it was 10 feet where i was.
>>Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:44 AM -05:00 from Joseph Eisenberg < joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com >:
>>I mostly have mapped in parts of Indonesia where there was no data, and the new road or river was mapped for the first time.
>>Usually I try to split roads and rivers every ~10 kilometers. 
>>- Joseph Eisenberg
>>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 8:46 AM Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk at openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>>Jun 13, 2020, 08:03 by  f at zz.de :
>>>>On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:19:46AM -0400, James wrote:
>>>>>No they shouldn't, mapping roads in northern Canada, your bbox can become
>>>>>quite large quickly as mapping logging roads/dirt roads is quick and easy,
>>>>>but span over multiple kms
>>>>The point is that the line/way of that road should also not span tens of
>>>>kms. You should break that up every couple of kilometers.
>>>Not alway, there are reasonable cases for mapping long roads without such
>>>In many poorly mapped places you can still map 100km of road/river
>>>in one go, without need for splitting it.
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>talk mailing list
>>>talk at openstreetmap.org
>>talk mailing list
>>talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200613/5f38832c/attachment.htm>

More information about the talk mailing list