[OSM-talk] river - stream

[80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru]

i did not write the e-mail program,
 
but it looks like your talking about (reply all) not (reply).
  
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 2:28 PM -05:00 from Dave F via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>:
> 
>Could you please reply to the forum list not just the sender. I assume you're the OP. Difficult to tell when you use different email addresses.
>
>>then why is the picture on top of the bridge when bridge is added.
>
>You appear to be confusing the ID editor with actual renderings of the map. How it appears i iD when in edit mode is irrelevant. We map & tag so renderers can produce detailed maps.
>
> 
>On 06/06/2020 01:57, John D. wrote:
>>tunnel looks better than bridge, water is still visible under the layer of bridge, or area, does not hide water. 
>> 
>>tunnel hides water.
>> 
>>>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk  <talk at openstreetmap.org> :
>>>  
>>>On 05/06/2020 13:45, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>>> 
>>>>
>>>> when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ?
>>>There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This
>>>goes for all scenarios, including roads.
>>>
>>>DaveF
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>talk mailing list
>>>talk at openstreetmap.org
>>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200613/6827846a/attachment-0001.htm>