[OSM-talk] river - stream

80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru 80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru
Sat Jun 13 22:23:27 UTC 2020


ok !

  
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 5:19 PM -05:00 from John D. <jdd3 at mail.ru>:
> 
>OK !
>
> 
>>Saturday, June 13, 2020 4:24 PM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk at openstreetmap.org >:
>> 
>>Though if valid tagging results in poor results, then it still can be reported
>>https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD (check whatever it is already reported before making a new issue)
>> 
>>Jun 6, 2020, 12:28 by talk at openstreetmap.org:
>>>>then why is the picture on top of the bridge when bridge is added.
>>> 
>>>You appear to be confusing the ID editor with actual renderings of the map. How it appears i iD when in edit mode is irrelevant. We map & tag so renderers can produce detailed maps.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>On 06/06/2020 01:57, John D. wrote:
>>>>tunnel looks better than bridge, water is still visible under the layer of bridge, or area, does not hide water. 
>>>> 
>>>>tunnel hides water.
>>>> 
>>>>>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk  <talk at openstreetmap.org> :
>>>>> 
>>>>>On 05/06/2020 13:45, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ?
>>>>> 
>>>>>There can't be both a tunnel and bridge. It's one or the other. This
>>>>>goes for all scenarios, including roads.
>>>>> 
>>>>>DaveF
>>>>> 
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>talk mailing list
>>>>>talk at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>>_______________________________________________
>>talk mailing list
>>talk at openstreetmap.org
>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk 
> 
> 
> 
>  
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200614/78881bb0/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list