[OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

[Phil Wyatt]

I am sure others may have seen this 'blacklist' implementation for showing a reminder about attribution.

https://twitter.com/cq94/status/1234528717604577282

Worthy of consideration for openstreetmap.org?

Cheers - Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> 
Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2020 11:23 AM
To: Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>
Cc: openstreetmap <talk at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

Is there any update about the attribution guidelines?

At this point is there a chance that further comments and concerns will be addressed, or is this a "done deal", where community input is no longer going to be considered?

- Joseph Eisenberg

On 2/19/20, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> The LWG has now integrated feedback from the initial airing in August 
> last year, from a total of three sessions at SOTM-US and SOTM in 
> Heidelberg, feedback from the OSMF board and from the wider OSM community.
>
> Barring any major late developing issues, we intend to forward this to 
> the OSMF board for formal approval at the next LWG meeting on the 12th 
> of March. If you have any comments please feel free to add them to the 
> wikis talk page.
>
> The updated document can be found here 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft_Attribution_Guideline
>
> Simon
>
> PS: please disregard the numbering in the document, that will not be 
> present on the OSMF wiki.
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk