[OSM-talk] Examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

[Florian Lohoff]

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:39:11AM +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> > Legally this is broken. Legally you may not enter the zone when
> > your destination is not within that zone and there nothing like a 
> > distance based penalty within that area.
> > 
> > So yes - there is a problem - But not within tagging. Its something
> > routers need to solve.
> 
> Routers cannot work alone, they have to work together with the tagging.
> It's not fair to claim it's all their problem. If the tagging does not
> represent the nuances required, the router should not be expected to
> just guess (at least where the difference is between legal and illegal).

Dont get me wrong - If there is information missing to distinguish
cases i am happy to find new tags/ways to describe them.

For a destination case routers need to take that step.

If there is a grid of roads all connect each other and all of them are
destination its basically a subgraph which you pay a penalty to enter.
Its not a "per distance" penalty which it is currently for the ones
i am using/testing regularly. 

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
        UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200525/0f0d767b/attachment.sig>