[OSM-talk] Idea for improving mapping system

[Dave F]

All the OSM 'leaderboard' sites I've seen are based on quantity.
OSM needs more quality mappers.

There's a page which tabled the number of changesets created by 
individual contributors per day/week/month. I believe this led to a few 
anal retentives quickly creating one changeset for every couple of 
amendments. desperate to stay a the top of the list.  Not only does this 
speed editing create errors , it meant validation was even harder than 
having one changeset over a large area.

  DaveF

On 18/10/2020 03:31, TheAdventurer64 wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A user and I were talking about implementing a system for better 
> mapping, as described here:
> https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1602968516431900
> This addition would have many benefits, including:
> * More mapping. We have tons of new mappers each day, as well as a 
> great editor for them. However, many of these new mappers leave after 
> just a few edits. Examples:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lukastheg03
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Th3Roomi3
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20201018/6dfd360c/attachment-0001.htm>