[OSM-talk] reddit AMA with some OSMF Board members. 15:00Z 9 Nov
Rory McCann
rory at technomancy.org
Thu Oct 29 21:25:53 UTC 2020
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, at 9:30 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> So i suppose you will circumnavigate any subject related to OSMF
> governance or the election and that you will not refer to what is going
> to be said there in any future discussion of OSMF matters (because then
> it would need to be considered as part of a consultation by the board).
What, you think, I personally am not allowed to even _talk_ about anything to do with OSMF unless it's (e.g.) on this mailing list?! Come on, Christoph, that's ridiculus. If someone emails me, am I required to publish that email and any reply I make?! Seriously that's not what the committment to open communication channels means.
A web page is open protocols. The existance of some JS trying to nudge you to sign up doesn't make it "closed". Annoying maybe, but it's still open. Both archive.org & archive.is appear to be able to arcive reddit posts, so you have a way to view it.
Anyway, I'll save the web page after and send it to you, just to be 100% sure.
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, at 9:30 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
>
> > Rory McCann <rory at technomancy.org> hat am 29.10.2020 21:06 geschrieben:
> >
> > This just a social thing, not official announcements, so that doesn't apply. 🙂
>
> Quoting from the commitment:
>
> > For the purpose of this commitment, essential communications
> > include:
> > * Publications or consultations by the board, WGs, committees or
> > other Foundation bodies.
> > * Communications mandated by OSMF policies/guidelines/frameworks
> > and similar documents.
> > * Anything related to how the OSMF is governed, such as AGMs and
> > elections.
>
> So i suppose you will circumnavigate any subject related to OSMF
> governance or the election and that you will not refer to what is going
> to be said there in any future discussion of OSMF matters (because then
> it would need to be considered as part of a consultation by the board).
>
> > Regardless, you can read/vew it without needing to create an account, so essentially, there will be a web page you can read. 🙂
>
> Quoting again from the commitment:
>
> > By open platforms, we mean those that are accessible through
> > open-source software and open protocols, and do not require an
> > account at a third-party service to access. (Read-only public
> > access is sufficient for one-way publications, but not two-way
> > communications.)
>
> By the way - reddit has been most notorious in making their platform
> essentially inaccessible to anyone who does not sign up with them - i
> frequently when following links from some search results to their
> platform have not been able to view the actual content because it was
> hidden by javascript nudging you to sign up. So you should not make
> the assumption that content on reddit is accessible to everyone
> (although i kind of think that in 2020 that should be common knowledge
> for any proprietary corporate platform - just like twitter, facebook
> etc.)
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann
> http://www.imagico.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
More information about the talk
mailing list