[OSM-talk] Too much detail, or: mapping every single tree in a park

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Apr 27 08:40:30 UTC 2021




Apr 27, 2021, 05:02 by osm at dead10ck.com:

> I came across this:>  
>  
>  > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.71889/-73.78869>  
>  
>  > And can't help but think that this serves no utility to anyone whatsoever
>
Used at least in 3D rendering and ridiculously detailed maps

> I hesitate to destroy the effort of someone who clearly spent a significant amount of time meticulously mapping each tree, but... at the same, does it really help anyone to know where each individual tree is in a park?>  
>  
>  > Maybe I'm too pessimistic. What does everyone else think? Is there such a thing as too much detail? Where do we draw the line?>  
>
Mapping trees as nodes seems fine.

Mapping individual paving stones or branches of tree is not.

For some people mapping trees is interesting in itself, I just got yesterday question is
it OK to map individual trees with their species in OSM
(someone wants to map catalog of trees near place where they live).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20210427/c7b64fb6/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list