[OSM-talk] Persian/Arabian Gulf Tagging
Ebrahim Nejati
enejati at mail.um.ac.ir
Mon Dec 6 19:54:02 UTC 2021
Dear Abdullah,
Abdullah Abdulrhman <abdullahOSM at outlook.com> writes:
> To solve the problem, the option of the two names A/B may be
> acceptable to defuse this conflict, but you did not accept this
> solution and you insist on not recognizing the Arabic name at all.
Just to be clear, I'm (personally) NOT against A/B solution. I agree with
any solutions that we can reach a consensus on. I defended the `no name`
solution just to avoid editwars and focus on mapping data on naming tags
which are more accurate.
> Also, the Saudi Arabia Telegram group which it's basically the main
> OSM Arabic group in Telegram since it has members from all around the
> Arab countries agrees with what I said and they follow this discussion
> and they are with the Arabic name and do not even accept the Iranian
> name as the only primary name for this water body, see:
> https://t.me/OSMSaudi
Looking at the name, I thought this was only limited to Saudi Arabia. If
possible, can you set up a poll in your telegram group to vote on
different options (including: Only one name, A/B, no-name)? I'll try to
do the same on OSM Iran telegram group.
My intention from this is to see how MORE people from local
communities `feel` about each option. This can help to choose an option
which that result in minimum edit wars in future.
More information about the talk
mailing list