[OSM-talk] Survey coming
Christoph Hormann
osm at imagico.de
Sun Jan 10 20:39:54 UTC 2021
On Sunday 10 January 2021, Allan Mustard wrote:
> The respondents constitute a sample of the target population. Since
> we don't really know what the population looks like (we don't even
> know the breakdown by gender, do we?) we are aiming for as large a
> sample as possible. With a large enough sample, the law of big
> numbers [1] takes over.
No, sorry, that is mathematically incorrect. A larger sample size will
not reduce any *systematic* bias you have in sample selection, it will
just reduce the noise resulting from *randomness* in sampling.
That does not mean a large sample size is not useful, in particular if
you want to weigh the resposes differently to compensate for a known
bias in selection but a large sample size is not in any way a
substitute for ensuring an unbiased sampling.
Even without knowing your target population composition precisely
(though we do know some things with some degree of certainty - for
example geographic distribution of active mappers) you can do a lot to
minimize bias in survey design.
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the talk
mailing list