[OSM-talk] problem with HOT mapping in Niger
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Sun May 9 21:51:41 UTC 2021
I used to do a lot of validation on HOT projects. However to make it
work you needed to contact the mapper in a very short time frame.
These days I have my own set of tools which I use to clean up the map
especially in Africa. I can clean up the errors in an area that covers
the HOT project much faster than going through the HOT validation process.
I must confess if I see a dozen highways with name=road on them I have
been known to remove the name=road tag.
I have left a comment on the HOT project.
I have got feedback from the mapper who changed at least one
highway=unclassified, their comment was
"OK ... The highway specifications for this missing map project are
simple for mapping : tracks ou residential ... but further a global
validation will be led with more details for major roads connecting
This mapper happens to be the person who has validated most on the
project. The instructions are in many ways fine if it applied to new
highway that were mapped as part of the project. You could simply do a
clean up afterwards but what seems to have happened is a large section
of the map has had many highway=unclassified etc. highways reclassified
to track and that is a bigger problem. Often snapshots are taken of the
map and downloaded to OSMand etc. So even if it was wrong for a week
before being corrected the effects could linger through other systems.
Not exactly reassuring that they won't continue to change tags.
The clean up isn't the concern. I can whip through the area with JOSM
and slowly correct them as I have done with most of Niger. HOT projects
themselves typically cover a fairly small area. Reverting might throw
the baby out with the bathwater and there is little enough mapping in
Niger as it is.
The concern is two fold, first one mapper who was working with me and
mapping settlements and connecting highways got disheartened by the
sheer number of incorrectly tagged highways and second and more
important is prevention is cheaper than clean up.
These days to get to the instructions on a HOT project you need to say
you want to map etc. There is a certain amount of "phone menu
purgatory" in extracting them.
I think most HOT projects refer to the African Highway wiki as I would
expect. This one seems recent and the concern is the instructions will
Andy Townsend wrote on 5/9/2021 5:10 PM:
> On 09/05/2021 18:08, John Whelan via talk wrote:
>> On project 10645 the instructions are:
> First things first - Have you tried contacting the organiser of that
> You might say "but it won't do any good". However one thing that is
> certain is that if you don't try and contact the organiser, they won't
> know that there is a problem.
>> The concerns are first older mapping which has followed the Highway
>> Tag Africa - OpenStreetMap Wiki
>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa> have been
>> retagged incorrectly.
> There are a few things that you can do to investigate this. You can
> try overpass queries with a date in an area to see if "highway=track"
> goes up and other highway tags go down.
> Once you've identified a project giving poor advice, you can see who's
> contributed to it, download changeset XML and see how many
> "highway=track" there are in there.
> I can see that you've commented at
> https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10645 . I'd also suggest sending
> the organiser an OSM message (or commenting on a changeset) so that
> they definitely get a notification about your comment. If they ignore
> you, let the DWG know by email so that we can let them know that
> someone's trying to get in touch.
>> Second how many other HOT projects have the same instructions?
> I've no idea; have you tried asking HOT if project text is
> searchable? This text doesn't seem to be trivially externally
> searchable, though a quick sample does find more references to "please
> refer to Highway Tag Africa" than the text that you mentioned.
>> Third how should it be cleaned up?
> What would really help would be if you could do a bit of investigation
> of the scope of the problem, in terms of:
> * Project creators that don't know that they should be saying "follow
> Highway Tag Africa"
> * Projects with incorrect text in the instructions
> * Incorrect data in OSM
> Once the size of the problem has been identified it'll be a lot easier
> to decide the best way to fix it. If it's just a few roads here and
> there, then a manual process following a todolist in JOSM or elsewhere
> will likely work fine. If it's "everything by mapper X needs
> reverting" then there are tools to do that.
> It may be that you don't currently know where to start with some of
> these "find out the scale of the problem" ideas. If that's the case,
> please ask - perhaps on the help site. Following a request from HOT,
> with a DWG hat on I've been going through a process of tidying up some
> overenthusiastic but undertrained corporate mappers over the last
> month or so. None of the things that I've been doing for that needed
> access more than the same OSM API that everyone gets to use, though
> some of the tools may be unfamiliar.
> It may well be that you'd like someone to help with data correction or
> reverts. Someone from HOT may be able to help with that; the DWG also
> could. However a request of the form "mappers A, B and C on projects
> X, Y and Z have incorrectly converted $number of non-track roads to
> highway-track in $country" is much more likely to be dealt with
> quickly than "some mappers in Africa might be using the wrong tags".
> Best Regards,
> Andy (from the DWG)
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk