[OSM-talk] Metrics

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Oct 17, 2021, 12:01 by andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk:

> On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 06:20, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
> <> talk at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
> >  that is why quality of paid editing is usually problematic
>
> Is it? Or do we only see low-quality paid editing brought here for discussion (or to the Data Working Group for reversion), while good quality paid editing goes unremarked?
>
Maybe it depends on area but in Poland overall value of paid editing
is negative in my impression.

To be clear, Yanosik is a case of company making excellent edits and
being a very valuable part of OSM community.

But for example Rocketdata is so annoying that overall it feels neutral
or negative.

See edit warring with mappers such as at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8152401642/history - after 
repeatedly claiming that they will update only opening hours!

(it was reported to DWG, paid mapper in question has not received
even 0-time block despite multiple new violations since 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4746 that was also
completely ignored)


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20211017/61125121/attachment.htm>