[OSM-talk] Voting for adding the Translate extension to the OSM Wiki now open
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Apr 26 23:13:41 UTC 2022
Hi,
On 4/26/22 18:17, Seth Deegan wrote:
> That's why using the extension is *optional* for translation. You can
> still use the old system if you believe a page should not be a 1:1
> translation and English-based
How can we make sure that there won't be eager translators who embark on
a quest to change every single page to use the "new system" without even
being in touch with those who cared for these pages before?
Can we make a rule that the extension should never be forced onto an
existing page without previous engagement?
Not a day goes by in OSM without someone "helpfully" doing an import or
clicking away on a badly designed task manager task or something else
that they believe makes the world a better place and later it turns out
they've caused more damage than they did good. I fear that the same
could happen to existing pages once the extension is enabled - someone
with too much time on their hands decides to make the world a better
place by creating Esperanto versions of all pages, and for this first
converts all pages to use the new extension, and nobody there to stop
them...
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list