[OSM-talk] OpenRailwayMap Electrification Status vs tag electrification=no

[john whelan]

>there are 1.4 mio lit=no, which is about 20 percent similar to oneway=no

I've seen many of these from iD editor and HOT mappers in Africa working
from imagery, mainly mappers with fewer than a dozen edits on unpaved
highways that are very minor connecting villages.  I seem to recall that iD
suggested these tags at one time.

Which would seem to suggest that although some are tagged by mappers with
local knowledge many are not.

Cheerio John

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, 10:04 Niels Elgaard Larsen <elgaard at agol.dk> wrote:

>
> Martin Koppenhoefer:
>  >
>  >
>  > sent from a phone
>  >
>  >> On 23 Feb 2022, at 14:05, Pierre Béland via talk <
> talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> It is more like adding oneway=no.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > while we do not add oneway=no generally, the tag shouldn’t be
> completely dismissed
>  > either.
> oneway=no is common on bidirectional highway=cycleway
>
>
> there are 1.4 mio lit=no, which is about 20 percent similar to oneway=no
>
> --
> Niels Elgaard Larsen
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220223/36f5d1ca/attachment.htm>