[OSM-talk] EG/Doxxing | Re: New moderation team & etiquette guidelines for talk@ & osmf-talk@ list

[Joseph Eisenberg]

I think “edit shaming” is supposed to mean “insulting or embarrassing
someone for spelling, grammar or typographical mistakes” but it is not at
all clear what the phrase means.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 7:42 AM Yves via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> I have to admit the term 'edit shaming' in the guidelines made me raise an
> eyebrow at the time.
> Sooner or later we'll need to have to draw a line for changesets one could
> feel ashamed of :/
>
> Yves
>
>
> On 9 June 2022 10:33:19 CEST, Amanda McCann <
> amanda.mccann at osmfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:18 +02:00, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> Could the board clarify if linking to changesets is considered doxing or
>>> not?
>>>
>>
>> I think that's a decision for the moderation team in how to interpret the EG. If you are unhappy with their decision, then you can appeal that to the OSMF Board.
>>
>> --
>> A. McCann
>> Secretary
>> OpenStreetMap Foundation
>>
>> Name & Registered Office:
>> OpenStreetMap Foundation
>> St John’s Innovation Centre
>> Cowley Road
>> Cambridge
>> CB4 0WS
>> United Kingdom
>> A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales
>> Registration No. 05912761
>> ------------------------------
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220609/4f797251/attachment.htm>