[OSM-talk] Automated Populate/Update Problem
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 07:31:18 UTC 2022
G'day,
Yes to contacting the Ozies on au-talk.
In general I'd be careful on changing the 'old' data as some of it maybe
better than the departments data, needs a judgement call. I'd think
adding to it is fine - reference numbers that are missing, that kind of
thing.
Adding new stops should be fine - assuming that the data is reasonable
location and quality wise.
Best .. talk to the locals, enter a few examples, say 20, of the new
data and state some of the conflicting stops differences between OSM and
the departments data - say 10? This would give a small sample
demonstration of what is intended and is easier to correct than 27,000
of them.
On 28/9/22 20:38, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Yep you'll reach Victorian and Australian mappers better on talk-au as
> some might not join the global talk list ->
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au.
>
> I'll echo other's comments here, if you are planning or have done the
> conflation I'd suggest sharing those results so the community can
> review and share feedback.
>
> On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 19:16, Phil Wyatt <phil at wyatt-family.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Given you are in Australia I would try the talk AU list as well.
> Maybe also the discord channels as there are a few Ozzie folks
> there in the Oceania channel with lots of transport experience.
>
> Cheers - Phil
> (On the phone so apologies for any typos)
>
>> On 28 Sep 2022, at 6:36 pm, rob potter <pots253 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> I have read the guidelines.
>>
>> I'm in Victoria, Australia
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Sept 2022, 18:07 Eugene Alvin Villar,
>> <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I work for the state transport department
>>
>>
>> Sorry if I missed this somewhere, but which state and which
>> country? Depending on the answer, there might be a local
>> community that can help and provide guidance as well with the
>> conflation/import process.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eugene
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 3:24 PM rob potter
>> <pots253 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I work for the state transport department and we are
>> looking to become an active member of the community and
>> as a first dataset we have focused on is our public
>> transport stops, bus and tram initially and then stations.
>>
>> I would like your advice on how to achieve the outcome.
>>
>> There are a number of considerations:
>>
>> o Currently in the state there are ~9,100
>> highway:bus_stop
>> o our GTFS - stops.txt has ~27,000 stops
>> o the current accuracy of highway:bus_stop needs
>> review.
>> o stops.txt location appears to be of a much better
>> quality
>>
>> My initial thought was extract current, match data
>> location, enrich what stops.txt has then create all new
>> and remove existing as final step.
>>
>> I would guess there are people screaming NOOOOO!! if so,
>> please advise of a viable way of making such a significant
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220929/9614d1f5/attachment.htm>
More information about the talk
mailing list