[OSM-talk] mapboox improve the (proprietary database used as en overlay) map
Marc_marc
marc_marc at mailo.com
Wed Apr 12 17:59:33 UTC 2023
[1] is the community buy-in for "Organised Editing" in France,
it'sn't really about this thread
[2] is the thread about the issue "improve the now-proprietary database"
but as you can see, not any mapbox reply anymore
Le 12.04.23 à 17:29, Rafael Avila Coya a écrit :
> I would say the discussion is this thread [1] and, specially, this other
> one [2].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rafael.
>
> [1]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2023-March/106121.html
>
> [2]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2023-March/106123.html
>
> On 12/04/23 17:02, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Am 12.04.2023 um 16:20 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk:
>>> From legal point of view it depends on specifics, but yes it can be
>>> legal to
>>> render using odbl+proprietary data.
>>>
>>> See
>>> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline
>>>
>> It should be noted that this guideline follows from the concept of
>> Collective Databases in the ODbL and in general of the idea of works
>> that can have multiple independent constituent parts. If what Mapbox
>> is doing is consistent with the licence naturally depends on the
>> specifics as Mateusz write, Marc, do you have a link to the discussion
>> in question?
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>> Warning: I am not a lawyer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Apr 7, 2023, 14:21 by marc_marc at mailo.com:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> following a discussion on the mailing list talk-fr,
>>> mapbox "improve the map" now feeds their proprietary database,
>>> the one that is displayed on top of the osm
>>>
>>> is it acceptable in terms of licensing to render using
>>> odbl+proprietary data?
>>>
>>> ethically it's obviously very bad to appropriate user contributions
>>> in this way, does anyone have a contact at their end to try and get
>>> them to return to more ethical behaviour?
>>> on talk-fr, no one from mapbox has replied since this behaviour
>>> was pointed out
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Marc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
More information about the talk
mailing list