[OSM-talk] bot proposal: shop values cleanup (low use values only, 1 used 250 times, three over 100 times, many used less)

[Marc_marc]

Le 20.04.23 à 20:50, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
> bot proposal: shop values cleanup

ok

> For start I want to propose to people to review shop tags in their area
> with undocumented shop values or ones documented as problematic.
> See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1u2o <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1u2o>

I find that this point has no place in a mass edition and it makes
your proposal less understandable
making 2 topics, one with mechanical editing of cases that do not 
require individual review and the other with a call for review of 
objects, would be more readable

> tags with highest use, among ones that will be retagged
> shop = chandler with 113 uses
..

and witch fix for thoses values ?


> shop = local_shop → shop = yes (though looking at
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6771559662/history 
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6771559662/history> and other - maybe
> this import should be reverted due to dubious quality?)

I don't see the issue, addr:ward ?
let's talk about it in another thread

> shop = retail → shop = yes
> shop = Retail → shop = yes
> shop = Retails → shop = yes
> shop = generic → shop = yes
> shop = ??? → shop = yes
> shop = retailer → shop = yes
> shop = retails → shop = yes

I think some of this may stem from the controversial decision to hide 
shop=yes in osmcarto, a decision I find incomprehensible. seeing that
a shop exists is better than seeing nothing, even if the type of shop is 
not yet known (there is a rendering for highway=road)
not against... but we are regressing as much as we are progressing

> add/remove s as needed - can I do this for all shop values where such
> modification will change them to a searchable shop value present in iD
> presets, also without going through review like this one?

"add/remove s as needed to match more common/preset"
is for me an acceptable rule

> with trailing space at the end - would it be fine to do it also
> with other known valid values (listed on Wiki or in iD presets as valid)
> if they appear, without a separate bot proposal?

removing all trailing space is for me an acceptable rule

> would it be fine to do it also with other known valid values
> (snip '_shop', ' shop', ' store', '_store', '_products', ' products'

you meaning removing space and _ at both begin and end ?
if so yes

> etc at the end of shop value if it produces valid shop type

and also if it's not an already documented/preset value

> shop=patisserie

shop=bakery

> shop=bijouterie

shop=jewelry

Regards,
Marc