[OSM-talk] Adding automated trees to OSM

[Harsha Somaya]

Hello! Thank you for your response. We will start a wiki page, as per the
OSM guidelines as well. The only reason we have not yet is because we
wanted the community's thoughts and general approval. We want our wiki page
to account for what the community wants. Also, since the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image is used but not fully
approved, we may use this. It would be very beneficial for anyone to see a
picture of the tree being mapped. Thank you for your insights.

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 7:17 PM Marc_marc <marc_marc at mailo.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> thanks for contacting the community
>
> Le 09.08.23 à 20:53, Harsha Somaya a écrit :
> > <
> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-tree-automation-worldwide/102197/50
>
> May I suggest you made a small wiki page about the project ?
> don't hope that ppl 'll read several threads to find faq about it :)
>
> maye the tittle should also be improved : automated in osm term mean
> you take data and change/add/delete in osm without humain review
> here it seems you want to allow our user to upload data
> into osm after human review, like any not-automated editor do
>
> > for the genus information, we are using |https://identify.plantnet.org
>
> as user of it, I find it very fine, it's better than an average human :)
>
> > Key:image <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image>, has rejected
> proposals.
>
> We're going to have to improve the wording (and even the arguments)
> because half the paragraph in question is wrong.
> the proposal was in fact rejected in 2013, which doesn't prevent the key
> from having de facto status, i.e. despite negative opinions in 2013,
> contributors thought it was an interesting attribute and used it,
> without any other alternative challenging the tag. This is (in my eyes)
> the 2nd status in terms of quality (the first being approved status,
> meaning that a majority of contributors think that the proposal is
> good... although we have seen proposals of poor quality being approved
> because the idea appealed, despite the problematic quality of the
> proposal).
>
> so if you want to use it, use it
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>


-- 
With gratitude,
Harsha


[image: Colby] <https://colby.edu/>

Harsha Somaya

(She/her)



<https://www.instagram.com/colbycollege/>
[image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/harsha-somaya-16aa7b224/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20230809/cee80190/attachment-0001.htm>