[OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions?

[Dave F]

Hi

You may wish to take a look at these changesets by a single contributor 
to decide if  you think these are  dubious websites added to tourist 
attractions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aliaksandr%20Kopyshau/history#map=1/37/3

The one in my locale had poor spelling (translation to English?) & 
grammar, took a long time to load & claimed if was copyright of the 
organisation/object that the webpage was about, even though it clearly 
wasn't (It was a bridge owned by the local authority).

They all have similar, yet slightly different URLs

 From the wiki:
The website tag can be used to provide the full URL to the *official 
website.

*These are clearly not official.

DaveF
**
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20230202/a2b7d9b4/attachment.htm>