[OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Jan 3 10:32:14 UTC 2023
Hi,
On 02.01.23 21:59, Andy Townsend wrote:
> It's certainly possible (as I've said in that discussion) to use OSM IDs
> as "stable enough to do real work with" - I do it all the time.
But establishing a "standard" to do it would likely exert pressure on
mappers not to do anything that would change an ID (I am imagining pink
warning boxes on the wiki explaining that you should avoid this or that
because it will cause lots of dangling links from the outside into OSM).
You're currently doing at your own risk and if it doesn't work then you
have no right to complain. Once we encourage people to create such links
from outside applications that are unknown (and might be inaccessible)
to us, these people will complain when links break.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk
mailing list