[OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Jun 27 07:29:27 UTC 2023
On 5/9/22 17:10, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Vào lúc 09:57 2022-09-03, Tomas Straupis đã viết:
>> 2022-09-03, št, 19:17 Mateusz Konieczny via talk rašė:
>>> as sole user of service=driveway2 declared that they are using it
>>> for all
>>> highway=service where no other service=* value fits, it can be cleanly
>>> removed fully automatically without any review
>>
>> If so and "driveway2" was added manually, then "driveway2" means
>> "checked, no value fits".
The value 'driveway2' does not convey this 'information'.
Possibly the value 'unknown' would be better.
However it would be best if new values that convey the truth would be best.
Example a parking entry/exit road (not within the parking area)?
service=passage ??? In fact this value looks like it may fit the
driveway2 description ...
However I normally just extend the parking_aisle to cover it - less work.
More information about the talk
mailing list