Folks<br>There's some guidance on the wiki about using labels but nothing very formalised. There seems to be some consistency in usage for common labels (name, class) and a lot of ideas and suggestions for additional tags.
<br><br>Are we at the stage yet where we should be trying to get a version 1.0 ontology for labels? If we could reach consensus on a very small set of labels and values then tools could start to rely on the meaning of these tag values and begin to present a richer experience to OSM users.
<br><br>What do people think. Is it too early to try to do this?<br><br>Etienne<br><br>