[Tile-serving] [osm2pgsql] [suggestion] Optionnal support for relation of relation aka "super-relation" (#101)

[Paul Norman]

Given the typical rendering usecase, I'm not sure that type=route superrelations gain us anything since they'd be rendered from their members anyways.

For the first boundary example, it duplicates http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/51477, which is a conventionally represented boundary relation for Germany. 

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/101#issuecomment-56556148
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tile-serving/attachments/20140923/804accb6/attachment.html>