[Tile-serving] [openstreetmap/osm2pgsql] Consider 2.0 as next release number (Discussion #2003)

[mboeringa]

Since there are some big changes for osm2pgsql upcoming, including a new 'middle' database format / schema, new options for expiry, faster -append etc, wouldn't it be a good idea to have 2.0 as release number instead of 1.9.0?

Or is 2.0 going to be where the old 'pgsql' output is going to be dropped (if there are any plans for that), and possibly the experimental generalization options integrated?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/discussions/2003
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/repo-discussions/2003 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tile-serving/attachments/20230715/6fbb0c93/attachment.htm>