[Tilesathome] lowzoom

[spaetz]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:59:55PM +0200, Frédéric Bonifas wrote:
> I don't unserstand your answer. I think the new lowzoom is a good
> thing and I already said it my e-mail. I don't consider the fact that
> the lowzoom tiles are not up-to-date as a problem (cf my e-mail 2
> months ago) and I just wanted to understand how the osmxapi was
> updated (I should have read the wiki).
> 
> I am sorry if my e-mails are felt as agressive but it is not the goal.

I apologize for sounding insulting in my previous mail. This was not my intention either.

Thanks for liking the experimental low-zoom. I think it's a definitive improvement. I misunderstood your mail as complaining that it's not based on the current data and that triggered my grumpiness button, I guess.

As the Zappy API is experimental, I am not sure whether it's currently updated at all. And if, it's updated manually. But being based on planet.osm it's probably going to be weekly (or 2-weekly, I odn't know how long the import takes. I could imagine that the planet diff's will speed up the updating of databases, so weekly might be possible)

I hope you are not offended, that was not my intention either.
spaetz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20070816/f3822ce8/attachment.pgp>