[Tilesathome] secondary_link

[Alex S.]

Raphael Studer wrote:
> I'm not verry happy about this.
> I don't belive this would be used often (maybe just 10 times
> worldwide), implement an extra tag for such a special case is a little
> bit overkill. Even more when you could reproduse nearly the same with
> standart tags.

There are several places I would have liked to use secondary_link (in 
the US) as I was mapping, because it would have been more appropriate 
than to use an unnamed secondary road.  It would, IMHO, get used a lot 
more than just "10 times worldwide".