[Tilesathome] Why sleep when you could render?
Dirk-Lüder Kreie
osm-list at deelkar.net
Mon Nov 5 01:50:40 GMT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dermot McNally schrieb:
> On 04/11/2007, OJW <streetmap at blibbleblobble.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, it was considered wasteful to download OSM data and process it, if you
>> already know that you wouldn't be able to upload the result.
>
> Generally, though, you expect to be able to upload the result (which
> is why it currently sleeps rather than bombing out). It's just a
> question of what you do while you wait to try again.
So why would you want to render a new tile before uploading the current
one? this would result in an even bigger upload backlog as it is already
and basically generate stale map tiles.
The bottleneck of t at h is the server, not the rendering clients, but we
have been promised a "new" server, so that should change to some extent.
- --
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHLnbwFUbODdpRVDwRAhydAJ4qJw1hUDNv55uRoui7tLPJcm1+5QCfaDF2
OWP25+GkbiEZcts7wxm416g=
=m0mb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Tilesathome
mailing list