[Tilesathome] Some First Day Stats
David Earl
david at frankieandshadow.com
Fri Nov 9 09:39:06 GMT 2007
On 09/11/2007 04:24, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> Of course, this brings up ... -- we want to multithread the actual
> rendering itself, since that results in faster turnaround time to users.
> Even if the queuing server is instantaneous, if each tileset takes an
> hour to render, we can't make the turnaround time get faster.
It would be nice to have a fast turn round on rendering, of course, but
my feeling is that reliability has been the main problem in recent
weeks. You are never quite sure when you ask for a tile to be rendered
whether it has failed or whether it is just taking a while to render /
be uploaded / whatever.
I'm sure this new server will go a long way to helping, so thank you
very much for doing all this.
With the renderers though, personally I think the priority with the
rendering would be to make the system more resilient to failure, and
maybe to improve the tools that tell you what is going on and where
something has got to. Maybe things like farming out different zoom
levels to different servers might speed things up, but it could be
counter-productive if downloading the data from lots of different places
then becomes a bottleneck.
David
More information about the Tilesathome
mailing list