[Tilesathome] Weird failure of T at H client

D Tucny d at tucny.com
Thu Nov 15 15:11:57 GMT 2007


On 15/11/2007, Christopher Schmidt <crschmidt at metacarta.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:58:10AM +0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:52:21AM +0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >> Hash: SHA1
> > >>
> > >> I just looked at my T at H client and found:
> > >>
> > >> I've restarted it (by typing ./tilesgen.pl loop), and it seems fine
> now.
> > >>
> > >> Any ideas what the cause was? Should I worry?
> > >
> > > The server was down for about two hours earlier today; this was the
> > > cause.
> >
> > Wouldn't that mean that most T at H clients would have stopped? Looking at
> > the Munin graphs, there is a 2 hour gap between 1700 and 1900, but after
> > 1900 T at H is quickly back up to full speed.
>
> Maybe I missed something in your email. The t at h clients, as far as I
> know, all died as soon as the server did. Are you saying that yours did
> not die during the server downtime ,but died at some time later?


I think his point is that when the server was down, his client died, but,
that looking at the munin graphs, it appears that most other people's seemed
to just continue after the return of the server...

I'm guessing that just deelkar restarting his renderers is enough to make
take t at h to as fast as the API will allow it, making the graphs look like
they do...


d
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20071115/208517f4/attachment.html>


More information about the Tilesathome mailing list