[Tilesathome] Using Batik to render tiles instead of Inkscape
Brent Easton
b.easton at exemail.com.au
Tue Oct 9 00:22:20 BST 2007
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/10/2007 at 5:40 PM Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>On 10/6/07, Barry Crabtree <barry.crabtree at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Did you have any problems with rendering icons with Batik? When I did the
>> shadow stuff it seemed to clip the icons. Take a look at
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Shadows to see what
>> I mean.
>
>This is because the symbols in osmarender don't actually fit inside
>the "viewbox" they declare. Inkscape evidently doesn't care, but batik
>does.
I thought it might be something like that. Batik appears to be far more rigourous in its checking of the SVG files, which I think is a good thing.
Inkscape just quietly throws away any data it finds in error with no error messages - There is no feedback if parts of the SVG are not being rendered.
In this case, Batik is doing the right thing I believe, the Osmarender icons should be fixed so that the icons fit inside their defined size.
Regards,
Brent.
____________________________________________________________
Brent Easton
Analyst/Programmer
University of Western Sydney
Email: b.easton at uws.edu.au
More information about the Tilesathome
mailing list