[Tilesathome] Request priorities

[80n]

Yes, something like this is needed.  The system is very unresponsive to
manual requests at the moment.

On 10/29/07, Matthias Julius <lists at julius-net.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Now, that we are tracking changes in OSM data and automatically
> request tiles that need to be updated (which is great), the pending
> queue is pretty long. Currently there a about 10k requests that are
> processed at about 400/h. This means it will take about 25 hours for a
> requested tile to get rendered. If you wait for that this is a bit
> long.
>
> If you are requesting a tile manually you can set a higher priority
> than the auto-requester. However, if the auto-requester was faster
> than you you're out of luck.
>
> I think it would be good if the priority of a pending request was
> upgraded when another request for the same tile comes in with a higher
> priority.
>
> Does anyone agree?
>
> Matthias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tilesathome mailing list
> Tilesathome at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20071029/0b0c41a1/attachment.html>