[Tilesathome] 'stable' t at h version

[Florian Lohoff]

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Knut Arne Bjørndal wrote:
> If I've understood you correctly you want to setup a stable branch
> where no commits go in before they have been tested by several
> people. This kind of setup is more pain than it's worth because most
> changes are small, simple and everyone is fairly sure it's going to
> work.

Yes all those little tiny bits beeing pushed through some QA is pain. 

This is why i suggested a HEAD and a stable branch - most users would
be running stable and some very brave would run HEAD. From time to time
you checkpoint HEAD into stable.

One can config which branch to follow in your t at h installation. I would
be happy running some HEAD instances somewhere in addition to the
stable instances.

When the client then passes its branch and release in the results you
could easily track the working of the HEAD branch without bringing the
whole t at h farm down with some silly little typo (Either there is a
opening or closing bracket too much)....

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                  flo at rfc822.org             +49-171-2280134
	Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little 
          security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20080827/95e70302/attachment.pgp>