[Tilesathome] [OSM-dev] Osmarender not always showing latest data

[Milenko]

Cross-posting to t at h list for FYI.

I'm building a new db on the server now, it should be ready to switch over 
tomorrow.  I just wanted to verify the proper method for applying changes 
after a db import to make sure this doesn't happen again.

When I built the server I imported the latest planet and then applied that 
days diff as well as all of the daily diffs from the latest planet up to the 
current day.  I then let osmosis run in read change interval mode and update 
the rest of the db.  So if I was doing this today (Sunday) I would import 
the planet from last Wednesday, then apply the change from 
wednesday-thursday, thursday-friday, friday-saturday, saturday-sunday.  Once 
this was done, then I'd set the timestamp to 12am sunday and run osmosis in 
read-change-interval mode to get the db current.

Is this the correct method?

-Jeremy


> All in that sort of time frame, so it looks like we've found our cause :)
>
>
> 2008/12/14  <milenko at king-nerd.com>:
>> This could be the fault of my ROMA server.  The landuse way is not 
>> present on
>> my server, although it does appear to be on the others and on the main 
>> API.
>>
>> I'm not sure how it's missing - my server must have somehow fallen out of 
>> sync
>> at some point.  Potlach lists that way as being created Nov 28th 2008, 
>> were the
>> other things you noticed missing also created around that time?
>>
>> -Jeremy
>>
>> Original Message -----------------------
>> One example would be the landuse=residential around Trimley St. Martin 
>> at:
>> It's (currently) on Mapnik at
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=B000FTF
>> But not on Osmarender layer per
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.98797&lon=1.31644&zoom=15&layers=0B00FTF
>>
>> And yes, the area is still in the data -- if you request a re-render,
>> I expect it'll reappear (I haven't).
>>
>>
>> 2008/12/14 80n <80n80n at gmail.com>:
>>> Rowland
>>> Can you make a couple of screen shots and describe what you see as being
>>> wrong.  Then someone might be able to investigate further.
>>>
>>> 80n
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Rowland Shaw <rowland.shaw at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's done it again since my previous message, too...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2008/12/13 Rowland Shaw <rowland.shaw at gmail.com>:
>>>> > Every so often, the T at H tiles show some really odd combinations of
>>>> > data which show older versions of older nodes (for example, not
>>>> > showing access=permissive which was added to a way) whilst still
>>>> > showing newer ways that have been since added -- requesting a
>>>> > re-render through Informationfreeway has fixed it on the occasions
>>>> > I've noticed this.
>>>> >
>>>> > Primarily, I've noticed this in this sort of area:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.02923827991905&lon=1.2023025518558124&zoom=16&layers=0B000F000F
>>>> >
>>>> > At first, I thought someone had reverted several hours of work, but 
>>>> > it
>>>> > seems to be something else, that has now repeated itself two or three
>>>> > times (that I'm aware of)
>>>> >
>>>> > Any ideas of the cause?
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dev mailing list
>>>> dev at openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
>>
>