[Tilesathome] Feature request: NoName highlighting in Osmarender map
D Tucny
d at tucny.com
Sat Dec 20 08:19:21 GMT 2008
2008/12/20 Matthias Julius <lists at julius-net.net>
> Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com> writes:
>
> > Sebastian Spaeth <sebastian <at> sspaeth.de> writes:
> >
> >>The astethetic is in the eye of the beholder. While it is true that
> >>osmarender shows more than mapnik, some prefer the osmarender look and
> >>use it as their regular map.
> >
> > Heh. I would switch to Osmarender as my regular map if it had
> highlighting for
> > no-name streets, since I like to take the opportunity to add extra data
> when
> > possible.
> >
> > A missing street name is something that can always be fixed, so it
> doesn't
> > clutter the finished map - only a partially-mapped area.
>
> Not all streets have names. Barely any street in Germany that is
> outside of a town/village has a name. I think it is only relatively
> safe to assume that residential streets should have names. And I
> guess this is why maplint only warns about those if they don't.
>
> Please, don't suggest to add no-name tags to all those streets to get
> them not highlighted.
>
> And again, osmarender is not a debug map. It is about showing what is
> there and not what is not there ;-)
>
>
Here residential streets are the least likely to have names as most
residential areas are gated communities with addresses being a building name
or number within the named community, 99% of the roads (oo, the same
percentage as made up statistics ;)) in these areas have no name...
BTW... I agree, don't make osmarender layer into a debug map... there is
already the maplint layer, osmi and various other tools that can be used to
spot problems, the osmarender layer is a base map layer...
d
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20081220/f418b026/attachment.html>
More information about the Tilesathome
mailing list