[Tilesathome] Proposal: New T at H Server structure

[Gerhard Schmidt]

Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
>>> I always perceive t at h as the more haphazard hobbyist layer. Look 
>>> at our current map at zoom level 2 and try not to run away crying.
>>> Makes one think that a good distributed server concept is not the 
>>> No 1 on the list of things we'd need ;-)
>> Agreed, extreme lowzoom is not pretty.
> 
> I didn't even want to suggest that someone should go fix it (although 
> obviously it is great if it can be fixed) - if the price for the 
> flexibity we have with t at h is the occasional botched map, then I don't 
> think that's a big problem. I just wanted to put the "swiss timepiece 
> engineering" being suggested for the server in contrast with the usual 
> attitude in t at h.

As I see it T at H does only Z12 and higher in loop mode. So someone have to do
the rendering by hand or am i wrong there.

Regards
	Estartu

-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Gerhard Schmidt       | E-Mail: schmidt at ze.tum.de
TU-München	      |
WWW & Online Services |
Tel: 089/289-25270    |
Fax: 089/289-25257    | PGP-Publickey auf Anfrage


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20080602/eceeb770/attachment.pgp>