[Tilesathome] upload/download volume

[Kyle Gordon]

François Van Der Biest wrote:
> Hi Marton,
>
> We could maybe use 50 heterogeneous machines ... we have :
>  - amd64 dual core @ 3GHz
>  - pentium 4 @ 2.8GHz
>  - core 2 duo @ 2.2 GHz
> ...with an average 2Gb memory
>
> Using wondershaper would be an option.
> We'll have to use it if our computers are too fast for our bandwidth ;-)
>
> Thank's for your answers,
> F.
>
>
> 2008/3/27, Marton Kadar <marton.kadar at mail.com 
> <mailto:marton.kadar at mail.com>>:
>
>     Hi François,
>
>     It greatly depends on the computer in question, the faster it is, the
>     more tiles it can render in a day. Tell us something about the
>     CPU/memory
>     setup of the computer, and someone with similar hardware will give you
>     a guess.
>
>     Also there has been discussion on this list about limiting t at h
>     bandwidth usage:
>     http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/2008-February/001826.html
>
>     Marton
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "François Van Der Biest"
>     To: tilesathome at openstreetmap.org
>     <mailto:tilesathome at openstreetmap.org>
>     Subject: [Tilesathome] upload/download volume
>     Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:48:27 +0100
>
>     Hi list,
>
>     At the office, we are currently thinking about using our spare
>     computer time to run the T at H client on our machines. Our sysadmins
>     wonder how many in/out data this represents for each machine every
>     day.
>       I've been looking at the "credits" page, and found that the
>     biggest uploader (congrats !) sent about 300Gb these 5 last
>     months, which is very impressive !
>
>     If you have some average figures to provide, that would be great.
>
>     Thank's,
>
>     F. Van Der Biest
>
Don't forget that you can set up one computer as a t at h proxy for the 
other machines. This way, you just have to limit the rate of one computer.

Kyle