[Tilesathome] Fwd: Xen virtual machine available

[spaetz]

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:21:02PM +0100, 80n wrote:
> Sebastian
> I'm putting OSMXAPI on it at the moment.
> 
> BTW its now optimised for bboxes so it can handle t at h render requests with
> ease.

cool, good to hear. we should switch to those read-only mirrors by default, i think

spaetz
> 
> 80n
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: spaetz <osm at sspaeth.de>
> Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Tilesathome] Xen virtual machine available
> To: tilesathome at openstreetmap.org
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:14:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> > spaetz <osm at sspaeth.de> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:18:46PM +0200, Rodolphe Quiedeville wrote:
> > >
> > >> > Sounds very cool. What do you think should we do with it? Install
> > >> > a really powerful t at h client? The server seems to become more
> > >> > stable now (/me crosses thumbs) and has jsut got 32GB and big
> > >> > local disks.
> > >> >
> > >> > Is bandwidth an issue? The t at h server has something like 4TB/month
> > >> > (very roughly).
> > >>  What is big in your mind ? ;-)
> > >
> > > Ohh, there's tons of unrelated stuff on that NFS disk, so a df
> > > wouldn't help much. I have no real clue how much space we take on the
> > > disk.
> > >
> > > As, I said, bandwidth is probably more of a problem.
> >
> > Maybe we should move OSMXAPI there.  And while it is idling it can
> > render tiles.
> 
> That sounds like an excellent plan
> 
> spaetz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tilesathome mailing list
> Tilesathome at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome