[Tilesathome] steam over landuse

[Chris-Hein Lunkhusen]

D Tucny schrieb:

>  <http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=51.912&lon=7.737&zoom=16>

> > But the stream is tagged as layer -1, so is underground as landuse
> > will assume 0 (but render behind other layer 0 objects).
> 
>     Yes, streams are often tagged as -1 so that they are rendered
>     under streets. In Wiki there is also the recommendation to
>     tag waterways as -1.
> 
>     So landuse should never cover other objects.
>     Landuse should be assumed as layer -100. ;-)
> 
> 
> I thought there was a discussion about this at some point in the past
> and that the outcome was that the feeling was that landuse should be
> drawn first, though allowing layers within the landuse 'layer' then
> other features drawn over whatever the outcome of the landuse layer
> was... which, would be effectively the same as making landuse
> effectively exist at -100 to -90...
> Can't remember the details, but will try and find the mails...

It makes no sense that a "virtual" object like landuse
covers any "real" object like streams or whatever, no matter
what the layer is.

And as you can check, Mapnik renders the above example correct.

Chris