[Tilesathome] no wood / forest at z11 and below?

[80n]

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at sspaeth.de>wrote:

> On 01/03/10 18:53, Micha Ruh wrote:
> >
> >     Containing what exactly? Lowzoom layers don't take much space, so
> that
> >     should be possible.
> >
> > ... based on the regular z12 tiles, creating an alternative lowzoom
> > layer, resulting in utterly cluttered lowzoom tiles (showing wood) :D
> >
> > see attached file
>
>
> Mmmh, that does look a bit cluttered, especially if you want to overlay
> captions.
>
> I really don't care about the look. If someone wants to set up a
> community poll about what is preferably, we could solve things that way.
>
> I tried it when low zoom was first created.  It really won't look good, but
I don't have any examples that I can point to.

Perhaps someone could perform an experiment (right down to zoom 1) so we can
get a like for like comparison.

80n






> spaetz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tilesathome mailing list
> Tilesathome at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20100104/cb04a2a1/attachment.html>