[OSM-dev] Is there interest in a Win32 installer for JOSM?
Robert (Jamie) Munro
rjmunro at arjam.net
Mon Apr 2 12:01:27 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Fleming wrote:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> Hi List!
>>
>> As I couldn't find a seperate mailing list for josm, I guess I'm right
>> here ;-)
>>
>> Is there interest in having a Win32 installer for JOSM?
>>
>> While "installing" the jar file is pretty simple - simply copy it
>> somewhere on your hard disk - it's just not the way a common win32 user
>> is used to work. Still no entry in the start menu, launch bar, no
>> association with .osm files and alike. And then getting into the
>> installation of plugins can be very painful if you are not an
>> experienced user.
>>
>> So having a Win32 installer would make the program much more usable for
>> the common windows user IMHO.
>>
> Agreed, although it may just (or as well as) be worth seeing if it can
> java web start to work?
>
> That way users can automatically pick up new versions, although the
> advantage a W32 installer would have is that the plugins could be
> included at install time.
I vote for looking at Java Web Start, as that is an installer for all
platforms, and it does automatic update checking. It would be good to
figure out a way for plugins to be automatically updated over the web as
well. Weather this can be handled by Web Start, or weather we need
something separate, I don't know.
Robert (Jamie) Munro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGEOKFz+aYVHdncI0RAjZNAKCnTBhGL/Dcwf7egm2Pk05YLZHwZwCg7+hA
sEVX5coh95J4RrBvnw0A0zE=
=0fzC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dev
mailing list